Of course, the Brit is already backtracking and claiming he didn't really mean what he said, but that's to be expected in this climate of cowardice and fear in which most people live. Here is the initial story from England's Daily Mail, in which Andrew Neather, a speech writer for former Prime Minister Tony Blair, reveals that immigration policy was driven, not only by the desire to acquire cheap labor, but to "engineer a more multicultural Britain," that is, to "rub the Right's nose in diversity." Or, in other words, to ultimately do away with British culture.
Excerpt:
Writing in the Evening Standard, Mr Neather revealed the 'major shift' in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office. The published version promoted the labour-market case for immigration but Mr Neather said unpublished versions contained additional reasons.
'Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural. I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended - even if this wasn't its main purpose - to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.'
The 'deliberate policy', from late 2000 until 'at least February last year', when the new points-based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said. Mr Neather defended the policy, saying mass immigration has 'enriched' Britain and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place.
Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said: 'Now at least the truth is out, and it's dynamite. Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock-up but a conspiracy. They were right. 'This Government has admitted three million immigrants for cynical political reasons concealed by dodgy economic camouflage.'
The chairmen of the cross-party Group for Balanced Migration, MPs Frank Field and Nicholas Soames, said: 'We welcome this statement which the whole country knows to be true. 'It is the first beam of truth that has officially been shone on the immigration issue in Britain.'
Related
See: This isn't Holland anymore
2 comments:
Remember the old saying, when in Rome, do as the Romans do? When you're a guest in someone's house, you abide by their rules, right? When you interact with English culture and English speakers, you need to speak English and participate in English culture.
After all, if your friends and family speak some other language, you can speak with them in that language all you want because then you're in your own element. But if you want to be accepted in other societies too, you need to learn their rules and apply them appropriately.
And by the way, I'm tired of white culture being treated as thought it's synonymous with boring. I can't stand it when people refer to something boring, simplistic, sentimental, or anything else undesirable in a tacky way as "white bread." Those white people and their culture are so unintersting, like Wonder Bread!
If these people actually knew anything about white culture, they would not say that.
And I hate being told I have so much to learn from all these people's experiences. Yes, you learn something from everyone you meet, for better or worse, but they have plenty to learn from me too. It's that whole "white bread" thing again. I can't possibly have anything interesting or important to say.
Back in the day, people who lived in multicultural neighborhoods could interact with each other because they learned just enough about each other to "get by." And they spoke English and participated in English/American culture whenever they came in contact with it. They didn't feel entitled to anything.
Adrianna wrote:
Remember the old saying, when in Rome, do as the Romans do? When you're a guest in someone's house, you abide by their rules, right? When you interact with English culture and English speakers, you need to speak English and participate in English culture.
Well, yes, this applies when the incoming group has no determination to plant their own culture. In the past, Europeans did not miss the fact that Islam is a civilization with adherents who deliberately transplant their culture wherever they land. Europeans fought wars to make sure that this did not happen. However, today, the desperation for cheap labor, along with the power of the "progressives" to indulge in their multicultural experiments (as indicated by Neather), has now changed the face of Europe forever.
And by the way, I'm tired of white culture being treated as thought it's synonymous with boring. I can't stand it when people refer to something boring, simplistic, sentimental, or anything else undesirable in a tacky way as "white bread." Those white people and their culture are so unintersting, like Wonder Bread!
Oh, this is just a game. Don't you believe it. The very people who are supposedly ridiculing whites for who they are, are the ones most eager to date and intermarry with that "white bread" crowd. This is just part of the game of "demoralize and conquer." There's no group that the coloreds find MORE interesting than white people.
And I hate being told I have so much to learn from all these people's experiences. Yes, you learn something from everyone you meet, for better or worse, but they have plenty to learn from me too.
Again, this is part of the game. If I can convince you that you are missing essential parts that I can give you, all the more reason for you to desire to hang out with me and let me into your social circle. It's all about seducing and controlling whites. See The everlasting quest: To transform whites and Outfoxing forced inclusion.
Back in the day, people who lived in multicultural neighborhoods could interact with each other because they learned just enough about each other to "get by." And they spoke English and participated in English/American culture whenever they came in contact with it. They didn't feel entitled to anything.
Back in the day, there was a prevailing culture throughout society, and that made the difference. In the mixed neighborhood I grew up in, we interacted sanely, all went to school together, where there was a common expectation for order, an order that was reinforced by our parents, who were influenced by the prevailing culture. If anyone had preached the notion that all cultures are equal, even criminal cultures, he would have been driven out as a crazy man.
Post a Comment