Solving the problem of "virtual segregation"

Did you ever harbor the belief that the Internet was somehow obligated to become a "force for unity?" Have you ever found yourself speculating on such a concern? Riva Richmond, a writer for the New York Times' blog Gadgetwise, informs us of yet another breed of social engineering busybodies now operating on the race-ethnic front.

In Does Social Networking Breed Social Division?, Richmond cites a new subdivision in the ever-expanding diversity/multicultural/race industry. For example, Harvard researcher Danah Boyd, is distressed by surveys that show that most Internet users of social networking sites tend to gravitate towards people similar to themselves. She has discovered that young people who use Facebook are generally "white, upper-class and college-bound," as opposed to MySpace users, who tend to be blacks or Hispanics who have not completed college.

Boyd claims that this information demonstrates a "modern incarnation of white flight," a situation that should not just concern the general populace, but "should scare the hell out of us."

Yes, it's really scary when white folks seek out social venues to freely associate among themselves. When will they ever learn that they cannot get away from the coloreds? How have they failed to glean this message, after decades of targeted laws and relentless societal pressure to conform to the rules of our "inclusive" society? What will it take to convince whites that "flight" is simply not possible – even on the Internet?

Still more "studies" on the subject come from Northwestern University professor Eszter Hargittai, who expected these differences by race and ethnicity on the web to "disappear" over time. Instead, she reports that such differences persist and have become even more pronounced. Much to the consternation of these social meddlers, Hargittai explains that people tend to use these sites "to connect with people they already know."

If choice such as this continues to be allowed for too long, how can we expect to achieve that "inclusiveness" so fervently desired by the likes of Attorney General Eric Holder? Recall how he lamented the fact that blacks and whites are failing to commiserate adequately "on Saturday and Sunday." (See Outfoxing forced inclusion and The everlasting quest: To transform whites.)

Notice, although blacks and Hispanics are choosing MySpace and, therefore, associating as they please, the condemnation goes to "white flight," or to those whites who are "fleeing" to Facebook. As in past censures of white behavior, the unexpressed presumption is that the coloreds would not be hanging out together (online or elsewhere?), if the whites would only open their doors – a sentiment more than implied by Holder, the man who wants a "dialogue" on race.

The notion of minding your own business and leaving people to their own personal preferences, does not occur to the likes of Danah Boyd, who worries that, if we don't address "head-on" this virtual form of social stratification, "inequality will develop deeper roots that will further cement divisions in our lives." Say, what?

Karen De Koster, on the Lew Rockwell blog, offers a solution to this newest integration conundrum: "Maybe we should just enforce busing on Facebook. Set up quotas on both Facebook and MySpace, and where those quotas don't line up, the government should bus white folks from the suburbs of Facebook to the inner city of MySpace by closing down their accounts and locking their computers out of potential Facebook registration."

Or, failing De Koster's suggestion, maybe it's time to set up more of those multicultural workshops, re-education centers, and "sensitivity" training sessions found on college campuses and in corporations around the country, to enforce the "proper" views on race. Not until participants in these programs demonstrate their belief in the "correct" doctrines that promote racial inclusiveness, should they be allowed membership on any of the social networking sites. Read more!

As relevant today as yesterday – 02

From time to time, I shall link to articles originally written for the former hard copy newsletter, or for Issues & Views-The Website (now an archive), to highlight features whose themes are still relevant. This is the second of such posts.

The world of John Johnson and Amos 'n Andy [2005]
It's hard to believe (or maybe not) that the supposedly prestigious NAACP could have had a beef with the satirical Amos 'n Andy show, and today grants awards to rapping, hip-hopping fools, who are among the creators of some of the filthiest forms of entertainment.

• • •
The onward march of government repression [2005]
Many a conservative believed that the removal from D.C. of [Bill] Clinton's crew would put government abuse into remission. Little did we know the further depredations to constitutional law that were waiting round the bend -- this time, in the cause of "national security."
• • •
Bound to the horror stories of the past [2006]
If there were any doubts that black elites plan to keep the fires of victimhood burning for as long as the earth revolves around the sun, such doubts should have disappeared with the renaming of James McCosh Elementary School in Chicago.
• • •
Free speech still struggles to survive, in Europe and in the USA [2007]
As the issuers of death threats and the torchers of homes and libraries constantly remind us, when mocking the First Amendment, "You have the right to try to be heard, but you don't have the right to be heard."
• • •
A hollowed out democracy [2006]
These media-conscious gurus have transformed the American political process, rendering it unrecognizable to those 18th century Founders.
Read more!

Help keep Issues & Views online

Although you won't always agree with the opinions on this blog, your financial assistance will help to disseminate the opinions with which you do agree.

Please consider using this link to PayPal:
Contribute
The link also leads to a mail-in form

Or send your donation directly to:

Issues & Views
P.O. Box 467
New York, NY 10025 Read more!